Research evaluation: Citation versus expert opinions

Lawrence Smolinsky examine whether peer reviewws and citation metrics measure similar notions of the importance of an article's importance, impact and/or value

Research evaluation judgements appear to be moving away from expert opinions, with more emphasis instead resting on citation counts. Professor Lawrence Smolinsky and his colleagues from Louisiana State University, USA, examine whether peer reviews and citation metrics measure similar notions of an article’s importance, impact, and value. They explore the relationship between the various phenomena related to the perceived importance […]

Read More… from Research evaluation: Citation versus expert opinions