The building block of all life is the cell. The architecture of a generic animal cell is well understood: a single nucleus resides in the cytoplasm, surrounded by the cell membrane. However, not all cells are generic. Both simple and complex animals in fact have some specialised cells with more than one nucleus. A cell with multiple interconnected nuclei is known as a syncytium. One place in the body where syncytia are found is the tissues that generate sex cells (sperm and eggs). In these syncytia, nuclei are connected to a common cytoplasm via intercellular bridges. The work of Dr Maddox and her team of researchers at the University of North Carolina focuses on the composition, dynamics and regulation of these bridges.
Syncytia: What? Where? and Why?
To understand more about the work of Dr Maddox and her colleagues, it is necessary to understand more about the syncytium. Though syncytia are a little different from the commonly taught norm, they are present throughout the animal kingdom. From the fruit fly, Drosophila, to humans, many species feature syncytial cells in their germline. The germline of a multicellular organism is the population of its bodily cells which allows it to pass on genetic material via sexual reproduction.
The structure of syncytia, including the properties of the intercellular bridges, has important consequences for fertility
The structure of syncytia, including the properties of the intercellular bridges, has important consequences for fertility. Intercellular bridges allow for communication and coordination among the nuclei that reside there together, incompletely partitioned like horses in barn stalls. For example, in various types of syncytia, cytoplasm must flow out of some stalls and into others to enlarge them. When the oocytes are fully enlarged, the bridges collapse, thus achieving cellularisation. If the bridges collapse prematurely, the oocytes do not enlarge properly, and are not viable. Thus, these intercellular bridges must be stable. However, Dr Maddox’s lab recently found that in the gonad of the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans, intercellular bridges are surprisingly dynamic throughout the germline, enlarging and contracting multiple times over their lifetime.
How syncytia form and are maintained remains poorly understood, however, research by Dr Maddox and others has begun to unravel some of the mysteries. For example, some of her earlier work identified a protein called anillin-2, which promotes the integrity of syncytia and endows the intercellular bridges with elasticity and stability. Dr Maddox’s lab has now discovered another pair of proteins that regulate the stability of intercellular bridges. Interestingly, one is implicated in a human disease of brain vasculature, so their discoveries of its mode of action may help our understanding of that condition.
The model organism for this study,Caenorhabditis elegans, is a tiny nematode worm with a history of providing answers to some of the big questions in modern science. In fact, work with C. elegans has garnered three different Nobel Prizes. Many characteristics of this worm make it a powerful organism for syncytial studies; not least the well understood architecture of its simple body plan and invariant lineage of its cells. Similarly to other model organisms such as the fruit fly, genomic modifications of C. elegans can be conducted with relative ease.
By manipulating the genome of C. elegans to introduce fluorescent protein tags, the team is using quantitative microscopy to gain unprecedented insight into the make-up of intercellular bridges. Quantitative microscopy allows for automated analysis of two- or three-dimensional images, meaning vast amounts of data can be analysed much more quickly than via manual measurement. Quantitative analysis is powerfully combined with high-resolution light microscopy techniques housed in the Maddox lab and within her department’s shared equipment facility.
Collaboration across the curriculum
The team of researchers led by Dr Maddox share diverse geographical and educational backgrounds and the scope of the project allows for the training and mentoring of individuals at several stages of their education, from undergraduate students to post-doctoral fellows. Amongst the lab members involved in the “hands on” research are Daniel B. Cortes, Kathryn Rehain-Bell and Michael Werner. Dr Maddox benefitted from the fact that the other researchers involved with this study are dedicated to and experienced with educational outreach. These activities ranged from interactive sessions with elementary school children to lab tours for prospective undergraduates.
Using the project to engage multiple audiences was very important to Dr Maddox. Her outreach activities sought out different groups within the University of North Carolina as well as individuals and groups in the local community.
One of the groups Dr Maddox was keen to involve with this project was the local education sector. She approached this aim in two ways. Firstly, each summer a teacher is invited to participate with the lab work for a 3-5 week internship. Dr Maddox hopes the experience will inspire these teachers to take their experience back to the classroom and relay their new knowledge and enthusiasm to their pupils. Secondly, Dr Maddox visits an elementary school to teach children about embryonic development. This classroom based project was developed according to established teaching goals and with the school’s science specialist.
Our outreach activities will strengthen scientific research potential, not only during the funded period but for generations to come
Dr Maddox also wanted to make the most of the already-collegial campus environment at the University of North Carolina by creating innovative opportunities for engagement. In order to improve interdisciplinary collaborations between the fields of biology and mathematics, Dr Maddox developed a module that allowed students from these courses to work alongside each other. In the module, the students experience novel methods of quantitative analysis and computer modelling using data they collect in the lab, studying intercellular bridges. One of the most original pieces of engagement proposed by Dr Maddox was interdisciplinary speed-dating. During these sessions, biologists briefly present projects to mathematicians, physicists, computer scientists and statisticians interested in collaborations. Several successful partnerships have emerged from these events, and still more participants benefit just from the time spent building community.
Both the scientific and public engagement elements of this project provide numerous opportunities for future research. Dr Maddox is confident that the proposed outreach activities “will strengthen scientific research potential, not only during the funded period but for generations to come.” Scientifically, there are still many more questions to be answered about the dynamics of intercellular bridges with such important consequences for so many species.
What has been the most enjoyable and challenging aspect of your research?
Were there any surprises for you due to working with such a diverse team?
What has been the best thing about working with other faculty members?
Do you expect that future work of this nature will be conducted with C. elegans?
How will a better understanding of intercellular bridge stability be useful for humans?